| vBuddy - check your reputation | Cheap Web Hosting - starting at $5 |
AGENT
ORANGE
An open letter to the
Government of Australia
The ongoing concerns
of Vietnam Veterans and their families.
By Gary McMahon
Make no mistake. Our families and we Vietnam
veterans have been poisoned by one of, if not the most deadly chemical known
to man. The human cost of this poisoning has yet to be totaled. The two most
important features of this killer are the slow effect rate and the diverse
symptomology. That is, its effects are delayed. After being ingested by the
body, it is stored in the fat tissue only to be released at a later time.
The range of symptoms that this killer
throws out are obscene:
Dermatological, neurological,
gastrointestinal, and psychological disorders.
Chloracne, an incurable rash on the face,
neck, back, arms and legs, boils, blisters, skin irritation and sensitivity to
sunlight.
Loss of sensation and tingling in the
fingers and toes, intolerance to cold, damage to the peripheral nervous system.
Constant fatigue. Depression, inability to concentrate, nervousness and
irritability, insomnia, vertigo, loss of sex drive, recurring headaches, nausea
and sudden unexplained weight loss. Red blood rectal bleeding has also been
reported.
Respiratory distress, shortness of breath,
allergies, tender liver, recurring digestive upset and slowed digestion,
vascular lesions, stomach, intestinal kidney and liver pain, and stiffness.
Swelling and pain in the joints of the arms and legs.
Finally and probably worst of all, numerous
and varied birth defects in the children of Vietnam veterans. All documented in
our governments last mortality study into the health of Vietnam veterans and
their families.
New evidence supports the association
between chemicals used in herbicides in the Vietnam War and cancers and other
assorted health problems. It has been confirmed that there is a link to
Soft
Tissue Sarcoma, Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease, and
Cloracne.
There is also evidence to show an
association with the congenital birth defect Spina Bifida in veteran’s
children, and with a neurological disorder in veterans.
The latest Mortality Study into the health
of Vietnam veterans and their families shows a horrifying number of
abnormalities and serious health problems suffered by the families of Vietnam
veterans. While we may be prepared to wait for the wheels of government to turn
as pathetically slow as they do concerning our own health problems, we are not
prepared to give an inch or to listen to any bullshit when it comes to the
health of our children. This needs to be looked at and
fixed…NOW.
Although we refer to the chemicals as Agent
Orange there were in fact fifteen chemicals used extensively in Vietnam during
the war. They are:
PURPLE.…………A formulation of 2,4,-D and
2,4,5,-T used in 1962 to 1964.
GREEN...…………Contained 2,4,5,-T and was
used 1962-1964.
PINK..…………….Contained 2,4,5,-T and was
used 1962-1964.
ORANGE…………A formulation of 2,4,D and
2,4,5,-T used in 1965 to 1970.
WHITE……………A formulation of Picloram
and 2,4,-D.
BLUE…………….Contained cacodylic
acid.
ORANGE 11……A formulation of2,4,-D and
2,4,5,-T used in 1968 and 1969.
DINOXOL………A formulation of 2,4,-D and
2,4,5,-T.
Tested in Vietnam between 1962 and
1964.
TRINOXOL: …Contained 2,4,5,-T. Tested
in Vietnam 1962 to 1964.
BROMACIL….DIQUAT….TANDEX….MONURON….DIURON….DALAPON
Quantities of all of the above were tested
in Vietnam, 1962 – 1964.
Agent Orange is the best known of the
chemical killers as it was used as part of the massive defoliation program to
destroy jungle cover, crops and other vegetation during the Vietnam
War.
Prior to using Agent Orange the military
experimented with Agent Green, Agent Pink, and Agent Purple.
In 1965 Agent Orange and Agent White
replaced the previous agents and began to be used in even larger amounts as the
war escalated.
Agent Blue, the only agent not derived from
phenoxyacetic acid, was used through all phases of the war. All of these
herbicides were named after the colourcoded bands around the 55-gallon drums
they were stored in.
The volume of undiluted herbicide sprayed is
testimony to the wide degree of exposure among the military in all areas of
Vietnam. All military personnel were exposed, though some were exposed more
directly with greater amounts of herbicide than others.
Exposure came through contaminated food and
water; through direct contact to the skin and from breathing the fumes and many
other ways.
Also, the cocktail effect, the multiple
exposure to toxic agents like, 24D, 245T, Cacodylic Acid, and Picloram were
accompanied by stress, fatigue, high humidity and temperatures and the use of
other drugs.
The chemical killer that is the biggest
worry to veterans is TCCD (2,3,7,8,Tetrachlorodibenzopdioxin), better known
simply as dioxin. There are 75 different dioxins, but scientists recognize the
dioxin found in 245T as the most toxic synthetic chemical in existence. Out of
44 million lbs. Of 245T sprayed, some 368 lbs. Of TCDD were deposited in
Vietnam.
When we look at the degree of toxicity of
dioxin it amazes me that anyone would bother to do surveys and health studies
trying to prove or disprove a link. This stuff is unbelievably
deadly.
Think of Dioxin this way; it is measured in
parts per trillion. This can be roughly compared to a teaspoon of salt mixed
evenly through a dump truck full of sand. The extreme toxicity of Dioxin makes
even this amount a potentially lethal dose. It is the most potent cancer-causing
agent known to man. The tiniest amount causes malignant tumors in animals. It is
also a powerful teratogen, causing birth defects and reproductive toxicity such
as stillbirths and miscarriages.
The sick part is, TCDD does NOT kill plants. It could have been removed from
245T without affecting its purpose. The manufacturers knew its extreme toxicity
and the danger of using it, but TCDD was not removed
from 245T because that would have increased production
costs.
There needs to be action taken NOW.
Who the hell do the leaders of this country
think they are? Do they honestly think they can get away with allowing the
nations Armed Forces to be poisoned and then do nothing about
it.
So far the diversity of these symptoms and
the slow effect rate have encouraged government agencies to downplay the
problem. Goodness knows how many veterans have died or suffered because of their
inaction.
Remember that scientists knew the Agent
Orange problems as early as 1972. The National Academy of Sciences in the US, in
1974, released their report, "The Effects of Herbicides in South Vietnam." They
called for a variety of studies to begin immediately yet neither our federal
government, nor the US federal government, or the scientists did anything. They
still do nothing?
The Australian governments' latest study
into The Mortality of Vietnam Veterans and their Families shocked even us
Vietnam veterans.
The report shows that veterans, their spouse
and their children suffer from a range of illnesses much, much higher than the
rest of the population.
We all know about the greatly elevated rates
of Spina Bifida and Cancer, and other normally rare diseases but I was shocked
to the core when I read that the number of deaths of Vietnam veterans children
from accident and suicide is 250% higher than for other
Australians.
Other examples are:
Male breast cancer……………………..2,500%
higher
Ischaemic heart
disease……………….200%
Leukemia…………………………………300%
Prostate
cancer………………………….300%
Cancer of
colon………………………….350%
Motor neuron
disease…………………..6000%
Cleft lip or
palate………………………...400%
Absent body
parts……………………….1000%
Spina
Bifida………………………………1000%
I won't go on. I don't think I need to. This
needs to be dealt with now.
We can no longer tolerate the inaction of
our so-called leaders.
While we veterans now continue the task of
fighting the government for treatment and disability payments, we need to
remember who we are up against and the things they will do to deny
responsibility.
The following is a reminder of the level
they will stoop to. It is taken from The Vietnam Veterans Association of
Australia's answer to The Report of the Royal Commission into the use and
effects of Chemical Agents on Australian Personnel in Vietnam. I
QUOTE:
THE TREATMENT OF
EVIDENCE
The Commission's judgement on the
question of exposure can only be understood when seen in context of the overall
treatment of evidence. Evidence supporting the veterans' claims was without
exeption rejected. Evidence suggesting that exposure was slight or that the
chemicals involved were less than toxic was accepted without question or
hesitation. In order to follow this approach it was necessary, at times, for the
Commission to go to extraordinary lengths.
One of the key witnesses called on behalf
of the Chemical companies was Mr. John Bamford. The Victorian Lands Department
had employed Mr. Bamford as a member of a spraying team. He used 245T AND 24D,
the active ingredients of Agent Orange. In cross-examination Mr. Bamford
described the casual way in which he and his work mates had treated the
chemicals, often spraying each other as if the material were water. On one
particular hot day Mr. Bamford had climbed into the herbicide tank in order to
cool off.
Justice Evatt was impressed by Mr.
Bamfords evidence and he notes that at the time of his appearance before the
commission Mr. Bamford was in good health as were his children. In his final
report Justice Evatt concluded that Bamfords case added weight against any
suggestion that 245T and 24D may cause short or long-term
illness.
But this is not the conclusion that an
objective assessment of Bamfords testimony demands. In citing the Bamford case
as evidence against the veterans claims it was necessary for the Commission to
omit all reference to the testimony given by Bamford during cross-examination by
the QC assisting the VVAA.
Under questioning Mr. Bamford was asked
about the fate of his workmates who had also been exposed to high concentrations
of 245T and 24D.
He revealed that his workmates were now
all dead. (Transcript p.1035)
Justice Evatt did not think this
information compromised the Commission's verdict. In other words Bamford was
well: this proved the chemicals were harmless. The fact that others were dead
was not even worth a mention.
Tragically it is now known that since
giving evidence, Mr. Bamford has experienced severe ill health. He has
subsequently been diagnosed as suffering from health effects that the VVAA
claimed are caused by exposure to 245T. Nothing was said to suggest Mr. Bamford
suffered PTSD.
You can see from this sort of thing what a
load of garbage we have had thrown at us over the years by the arrogant people
we have had to deal with in our quest for fair and just
treatment.
The Department of Veterans Affairs stooped
to about gutter level during the Royal Commission too. Again I quote from the
VVAA's answer to the report from the Royal Commissioner.
"When one looks at the complaints
concerning the Department of Veterans Affairs and the files of people like
"veteran 12" (in the report) where the departments conduct was life threatening
and where documents were altered to cover the conduct. Or "veteran 11" (in the
report) whose life might have been saved if the medical officers of the
department were more active, it is difficult to see how Justice Evatt cannot be
concerned about such conduct. Where the department was caught out the Commission
says (Vol.7,p.xiv-227)
"The Commission notes that DVA frankly disclosed the falsification of the
records. This is typical of the open way which DVA has accepted the
investigations by this Commission."
"What is not said is that the veteran
took copies of the file before the falsification took place - the DVA was caught
out by documents showing the falsification. Nevertheless Justice Evatt seemed to
believe admission of guilt excuses the conduct."
All that Vietnam veterans seek from the
government and the Department of Veterans Affairs is a "fair go". It is obvious
from the lousy treatment in the past and the huge range of health problems faced
by veterans and their families that we have not had that so
far.
It is time for action to be taken
NOW.
Gary McMahon
Vietnam Veteran.